Charter of Contractual Fairness
On 1 July we launched our Charter of Contractual Fairness

We have heavily drawn the principles of contract fairness from the new consumer unfair contract protections laws. If it's fair for consumers, it's fair for small business people - the self-employed and independent contractors.

We are currently writing to Australian corporations asking them to commit to contract fairness in their dealings with small business people.
Election Face-off 2010
Here's how the 2 sides currently shape up for small business/self employed people! (10 July 2010)
Gillard's ALP

So far, they've told us "here's what we've done!"

Started a superannuation clearing house
Begun a small business online inquiry service
Established a Small Business Advisory Committee
New liability contract guidelines for government procurement
National Business Name Registration
A new guide for self-employed people
Abbott's Coalition
They've announced the first part of "here's what we're going to do!"

• A dedicated Small Business Minister who will be in Cabinet
• A new Small Business Ombudsman to handle and resolve small business complaints about the federal government
The extension of consumer unfair contract protections to small business people
Retention of the current self-employed (PSI) tax laws
Stop small business red tape on Paid Parental Leave
• Mr Abbott's and Mr Billson's joint press release
What we've been asking for
The extension of consumer unfair contract protections to small business people

• Retention of the current self-employed (PSI) tax laws. Our letter to the PM (28 May 2010)

Failure to fix unfair business contracts
ICA says "extend unfair contract protections for consumers to small business".

New laws:
Legislation #1 (March 2010)
Legislation #2 (June 2010)

Here's our summary of the situation.
How the legislation defines unfair contract terms.
Why small business people should have TPA protections from unfair contracts.
We need an answer on tax, please
We've made it quite clear that self-employed (PSI) tax should not be changed.

We've written to the PM for an answer, but we do not yet have a reply.

Tony Abbott has been clear. NO change!
Industry/Retail super funds must come out
The Cooper Review into superannuation says the big funds are not disclosing enough and must be forced to do so. This is vital. See Chapter 4.

Here's why workers' money is at risk if disclosure is not enforced.
Look after your retirement
The Cooper Review of superannuation says Self Managed Super Funds are good and need little change to existing arrangements. This is welcome. See Chapter 8.

The Report also seems to have stopped the attack against SMSF's.
Stand Up for Your (Contract) Rights!
We're monitoring contracts in general and promoting good contracts in particular. For example:
Another bad contract (Jun 2010)
One of the worst contracts we've seen (Jan 2010)
'Tom' versus DEEWR (Nov 2009)
But a positive development from government
Ken Phillips comments
And some interesting discussions
Central Banks on Debt
Since mid-May, central banks have been worried about sovereign debt. Click here for a list of useful links and summaries.
Problems with Phoenix companies
Two ICA members' tell their stories
ATO information on reporting suspect activity.

Govt's attempts to do something:
ICA comment

Newspaper comment:
The Australian
The Age/Sydney Morning Herald
Business Spectator

What 'Tom' thinks
What 'Jim' thinks
Dick Davies Writes...
"...the human fabric of the workplace precedes in importance that of technology!"
Dick Davies prods us to think about management, independence and motivation. Click here.
Stop Sham Contracts!
ICA supports the prevention of sham contracts. We monitor what's happening with them:
One person's story
Successful FWO prosecution (Dec 2009)
Info from Fair Work Ombudsman (July 2009)
First sham contract prosecution: ICA summary
Make a complaint to FWO
Business Spectator article
Read the debate
... Unquote
The Pessimists' Economic Views
(Posted January 2010)
We've brought together some pessimistic views about economics and likely economic trends in 2010:
US toxic loans
'US as sick as Greece'
Ken Phillips's summary
An 'IMF' perspective
Predicting 2010
Government debt a giant ponzi scheme?


Click to enlarge.

Ken Phillips on the debt equation


Watching Goldman Sachs
Rolling Stone magazine has blown the lid on Goldman Sachs:
Article 1 [July 2009]
Article 2 [April 2010]
Article 3 [May 2010]
Tax burden: UK versus Australia
Just as the UK is moving toward more sensible small business (contractor) tax laws, in Australia we're having to defend the progress we've made.
Laughing lawyers
You'll be amazed by the 'slips' that some lawyers make in court.




























The Federal coalition has long had formal positions of support for self-employed people. In 2006 it introduced the Independent Contractors Act, a world first which put into legislative effect the International Labour Organisaton principles relating to independent contractors. ICA strongly supported and continues to support the Act. ICA did not and does not support the exclusion of owner-drivers in NSW from the protections available under the Act. In 2009, the Coalition demonstrated its understanding of and commitment to the sector in moving for amendments to the Fair Work Act. The following quotations from Hansard perhaps best explain the Coalition's position. Extracts from Hansard: Quotations from Senator Eric Abetz: Debate on the Fair Work Bill 17 March 2009:
    "Even the International Labour Organisation as recently as a few years ago said it is vitally important---they can see the sense in this---to separate out independent contractors from the employment relationship."

    "...if we were to pass the amendment that you suggested earlier that we should give effect to---not just consider but give effect to---ILO recommendations in this legislation, there would not be that sort of reference to independent contractors. Even the ILO says that that is a sensible way forward."

    "...we believe that independent contractors should be subjected to commercial legislation. Even the ILO agrees. I honestly thought it would be a no-brainer, given the most recent determinations out of the ILO in 2003 and followed up in 2006, that the government would be supportive of this, especially given that, chances are, the independent contractors are a more representative voice as to the needs and aspirations of small businesses involved in contracting than the government is."

    "Just in relation to our very first amendment in this tranche, if you go to page 6 of the bill, there is the heading 'Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organizations etc'. Anybody would be forgiven for thinking that that was dealing with the heart of industrial relations law. It then says: Chapter 3 sets out rights and responsibilities of national system employees, national system employers, organisations and others (such as independent contractors ..."

    "So we are interweaving independent contractors and enmeshing them with employer and employee relationships, which the law has consistently said should be separate. What is more, we can even quote the ILO in support, but we do not get actual engagement in relation to that aspect."

    "What Labor have snuck into this legislation under the definition of 'workplace law' is: '(c) the Independent Contractors Act 2006'. As I have said before, they are deliberately blurring the distinction between independent contractors being covered by commercial law---something the ILO acknowledges, and common law has recognised for a long time---and workplace law. They are now deliberately saying the law that applies to independent contractors will be part of the workplace law regime. Be under no misapprehension what Labor are trying to do with this regime. That is why the independent contractors, and we who unashamedly are on the side of independent contractors, are saying they should be disentangled---because it breaks a tradition of, I think, over 100 years of law in relation to independent contractors and is something that is now being recognized worldwide. I make that point as strongly as I can."